Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 91

The statement and conversation involve a critique of OpenAI's transparency regarding data access, suggesting potential ethical concerns in AI development. The tone is skeptical and critical, aiming to highlight perceived discrepancies in OpenAI's practices.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about transparency and potential ethical issues, which could be seen as striving to prevent harm by advocating for accountability. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but questions the integrity of OpenAI's actions, which could be seen as a form of constructive criticism rather than harassment. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By questioning OpenAI's transparency, the statement promotes a dialogue on ethical AI practices, fostering understanding and accountability. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning OpenAI's practices without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]