In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
101d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
102d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing energy policies and environmental impacts. It presents a viewpoint on the cessation of wind farm leases, suggesting it protects natural landscapes and energy consumers.
- The statement could be seen as doing harm by potentially misrepresenting the benefits of wind energy, which may mislead public understanding. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging the potential benefits of wind energy. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive dialogue, as it does not engage with opposing views or provide a balanced perspective. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.