In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
101d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
320d
The statement and images engage in public discourse by addressing the topic of gender identity and government policy. The tone is assertive and presents a specific viewpoint on gender as a binary concept. It implies a critique of opposing views, particularly those associated with 'radical gender ideology.'
- The statement may cause harm by dismissing non-binary and transgender identities, potentially marginalizing these groups. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy and dignity of individuals who identify outside the binary gender framework. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy towards diverse gender identities. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques opposing views but does so in a way that could be seen as dismissive rather than engaging in constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.