In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
102d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to government censorship and free speech. It claims that actions are being taken to end what is described as unconstitutional censorship by the federal government.
- The statement aims to address perceived harm caused by government censorship, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding and empathy by advocating for free speech, a fundamental democratic value. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes government actions, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by supporting free speech rights. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.