Michael Schellenberger

The statement is part of a conversation discussing an executive order related to the alleged weaponization of the federal government. It involves public discourse as it addresses governmental actions and policies.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but supports a potentially divisive viewpoint.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy but could be seen as contributing to a polarized discussion. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more congratulatory and supportive of a specific viewpoint. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement lacks constructive criticism and does not engage with opposing views. [-1]