Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement criticizes the previous administration for allegedly using federal agencies to target political opponents, suggesting these actions were inconsistent with constitutional rights. It accuses the prior administration of weaponizing prosecutorial power and highlights specific instances of perceived injustice.
- The statement aims to highlight perceived injustices, which could be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for justice, but it also risks harm by potentially inflaming partisan tensions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as disrespecting the dignity of those in the previous administration by making strong accusations without detailed evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and lacks a balanced perspective. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on accusations rather than solutions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.