Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -202
Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️
@realchrisrufo
·
1508d
SCOOP: @LockheedMartin, the nation’s largest defense contractor, sent key executives to a three-day white male reeducation camp in order to deconstruct their “white male culture” and atone for their “white male privilege.”

I've obtained internal documents that will shock you.🧵
1/22/2025, 4:30:45 AM
X
In reply to:
Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️
@realchrisrufo
·
172d
@shellenberger Thank you!
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
172d
@realchrisrufo Congratulations, Chris! You made it happen.
Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️
@realchrisrufo
·
172d
BREAKING: President Trump has signed an executive order rescinding Lyndon Johnson's EO 11246, which established affirmative action, and banning all federal contractors and publicly-funded universities from practicing race-based discrimination, including DEI.

A massive shift.

The statement and its context involve a discussion on public policies related to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI), affirmative action, and executive orders, which are significant public issues. The tone of the statement is celebratory, suggesting a victory over DEI initiatives, which can be a contentious topic in public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm with words, but the celebratory tone over the 'killing' of DEI could be seen as dismissive of the values DEI represents, potentially causing harm to those who support such initiatives. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the language used could be perceived as undermining the dignity of those who advocate for DEI. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it takes a divisive stance on a polarizing issue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it lacks engagement with opposing viewpoints and instead celebrates a perceived victory. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to promote a specific ideological stance, which may not be seen as for the betterment of society by all, given the divisive nature of the topic. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech but may not use the platform responsibly, as it could contribute to polarization rather than constructive dialogue.