Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -202
Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️
@realchrisrufo
·
1537d
Seattle Public Schools tells teachers that the education system is guilty of "spirit murder" against black children and that white teachers must "bankrupt [their] privilege in acknowledgement of [their] thieved inheritance."
https://www.city-journal.org/art…
1/22/2025, 4:31:32 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
172d
@realchrisrufo If one had to pinpoint the exact moment you killed DEI, it might have been May 26, 2021:
Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️
@realchrisrufo
·
1508d
SCOOP: @LockheedMartin, the nation’s largest defense contractor, sent key executives to a three-day white male reeducation camp in order to deconstruct their “white male culture” and atone for their “white male privilege.”

I've obtained internal documents that will shock you.🧵
Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️
@realchrisrufo
·
172d
@shellenberger Thank you!
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
172d
@realchrisrufo Congratulations, Chris! You made it happen.
Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️
@realchrisrufo
·
172d
BREAKING: President Trump has signed an executive order rescinding Lyndon Johnson's EO 11246, which established affirmative action, and banning all federal contractors and publicly-funded universities from practicing race-based discrimination, including DEI.

A massive shift.

The statement by @realchrisrufo refers to a controversial educational curriculum in Seattle, described as 'spirit murder,' which is part of a broader discussion on critical race theory (CRT) and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. This statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with societal issues related to education, race, and public policy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses charged language ('spirit murder') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of provocative language could indirectly affect the dignity of those involved in the educational system. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses language that could polarize rather than foster dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a term that could be seen as a personal attack on the educators involved. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement is part of a broader critique of CRT and DEI, which is a legitimate exercise of free speech, but the responsibility and integrity of the platform could be questioned due to the inflammatory language used.