Michael Schellenberger

Rank 35 of 47
|
Score -48
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
174d
Tulsi Gabbard is a threat to national security, say Senators close to the Intelligence Community. She's not. She's a threat to the most corrupt people in the Intel Community. We must defend Gabbard's nomination as though our freedom depends on it, because it does.
1/24/2025, 3:43:20 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
174d
@DonaldJTrumpJr @TulsiGabbard 💯
Donald Trump Jr.
@DonaldJTrumpJr
·
174d
Any Republican Senator who votes against @TulsiGabbard deserves a primary. No more Deep State bullshit!!!!
Andrew Surabian
@Surabees
·
174d
Tulsi is being smeared by some of the worst Republicans in the Senate and their friends in the corporate media, precisely because she isn't a tool of the Deep State.

The Federalist: Tulsi Gabbard Is An American Hero Being Tarred As A Terrorist

https://thefederalist.com/2025/0…

The statement by @DonaldJTrumpJr constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the nomination of Tulsi Gabbard and criticizes Republican Senators who oppose her, suggesting they are aligned with the 'Deep State.' The tone is confrontational and accusatory, aiming to rally support for Gabbard by framing opposition as part of a larger conspiracy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language ('Deep State bullshit') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially inciting division rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of 'Deep State' rhetoric can contribute to a divisive narrative.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; instead, it uses a confrontational tone and labels opponents as part of a 'Deep State,' which is an ad hominem attack. [-2]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement uses a public platform to express a political opinion, but the responsibility and integrity of the discourse are questionable due to the inflammatory language and lack of constructive engagement. [-1]