The statement and related conversations engage in public discourse by discussing the nomination of Tulsi Gabbard for a high government position and the criticism she faces from political figures and media. The discourse involves opinions on the US Security State and the political dynamics surrounding Gabbard's nomination.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement uses strong language like 'destroy' and 'bullshit,' which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm.
[-1]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the use of terms like 'Deep State bullshit' could be seen as disrespectful.
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on divisive language and accusations.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead using personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against political figures and media.
[-2]Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.The statement uses influence to rally support against certain political figures, but it does so in a divisive manner rather than for the betterment of society.
[-1]Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly, as it engages in inflammatory rhetoric.
[-1]