Gary Marcus

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 83
1/25/2025, 6:57:25 AM
X
In reply to:
Jade Cole
@JadeCole2112
·
107d
@Aging_Scientist @daaaaashr @DHuskytron @GaryMarcus @ChombaBupe This is weapons grade hopium
Kamil Pabis
@Aging_Scientist
·
107d
@daaaaashr @JadeCole2112 @DHuskytron @GaryMarcus @ChombaBupe Not just cancer, it's all human diseases including aging. It's going to happen when we have AI smarter than humans. These problems are not solvable using current knowledge in reasonable timeframes (that's what I believe as a researcher in the field). AI is the best shot on goal.
dashr
@daaaaashr
·
107d
@JadeCole2112 @Aging_Scientist @DHuskytron @GaryMarcus @ChombaBupe It's always the fucking cancer card. All.. fucking.. ways. If I‘d put money on that argument coming up, I would win every time. When is it actually going to happen? Or is the exploitation of all people the pathway to a cancer cure? Jfc
Jade Cole
@JadeCole2112
·
107d
@Aging_Scientist @DHuskytron @daaaaashr @GaryMarcus @ChombaBupe When is all that going to happen? So far they can’t even count the number of r’s in Strawberry
Kamil Pabis
@Aging_Scientist
·
107d
@JadeCole2112 @DHuskytron @daaaaashr @GaryMarcus @ChombaBupe They are inevitable. Don't fight progress. Do you want your family to die from cancer or do you want AGI to cure all diseases?
Jade Cole
@JadeCole2112
·
108d
Uhhh... what?

Who gets to decide how we change the social contract and re-organize society?

Note: This is called "assuming the sale" - he's talking about post AGI events to create the impression they are inevitable.

@DHuskytron @daaaaashr @GaryMarcus @ChombaBupe

The statement is part of a broader conversation about the role of AI in solving human diseases, which is a public issue. The tone is critical, suggesting that the participants are not well informed about clinical work's importance and cost. The intent seems to be to challenge the optimism expressed in the conversation about AI's potential.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a lack of understanding, which could be seen as dismissive. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does tag multiple users, which could be seen as confrontational.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is critical without providing constructive feedback. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructiveness and could be perceived as a personal attack on the participants' knowledge. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is focused on criticizing others.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, as it is more focused on criticism than constructive dialogue.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not violate free speech principles but could use the platform more responsibly by fostering constructive dialogue.