Gary Marcus

Rank 22 of 47
|
Score 68
1/25/2025, 6:59:27 AM
X
In reply to:
Jo
@JoJrobotics
·
107d
@GaryMarcus if Neuro-Symbolic AI is the correct architecture that'll lead to AGI then why no company is working on such architecture even tho they have all the funding and the talent?🤔🤔
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
108d
Me, last March: we won’t see GPT-5 soon; instead many competitors will converge, there won’t be much moat. Instead, there will be a price war. Profits will be meager.

China, today: All that, and we raise you a 50x reduction in cost.

Still no GPT-5 but GenAI is now practically…
Deedy
@deedydas
·
109d
China just dropped a new model.
ByteDance Doubao-1.5-pro matches GPT 4o benchmarks at 50x cheaper

— $0.022/M cached input tokens, $0.11/M input, $0.275/M output
— 5x cheaper than DeepSeek, >200x of o1
— 32k + 256k context
— sparse MoE architecture

AI truly too cheap to meter.

The statement about AlphaFold being neurosymbolic and winning a Nobel prize seems to be a sarcastic or humorous response to a discussion about AI architectures and their potential to achieve artificial general intelligence (AGI). It does not engage substantively with the public issues being discussed, such as the development and cost of AI models or the merits of different AI architectures.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but may confuse the discussion with incorrect information.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity, as it does not target individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it introduces a false claim humorously. [-1]