Michael Schellenberger

Rank 35 of 47
|
Score -56
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
544d
The US Intelligence Community says there's no clear evidence that Covid leaked from a lab in China, but there is. And now we are the first to report that a Chinese source trusted by the FBI told the agency in early 2020 that the first person infected worked in the Wuhan lab.
1/26/2025, 1:07:16 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
176d
The CIA now agrees with other intel agencies that Covid came from China. Finally. Incredible it took the election of Trump for the truth to come out. We reported 18 months ago that the patients zero worked in the Wuhan lab. Now let's get truth on Russiagate, laptop, JFK & UAPs.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
769d
After years of official claims to the contrary, strong new evidence suggests the virus known as SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a Chinese lab. According to multiple sources, the researchers who led gain-of-function research, which increases infectiousness, were the first to be infected.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the origins of COVID-19, a significant public health and geopolitical issue. It references intelligence sources and suggests a lab leak theory, which has been a contentious topic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified information, which may lead to misinformation or heightened tensions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the privacy and dignity of individuals involved, as it implicates specific people and institutions without clear evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a controversial claim without fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement lacks constructive criticism and may contribute to divisive discourse rather than engaging in a balanced discussion. [-1]