Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -87
1/26/2025, 3:46:43 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
176d
A Chinese source trusted by the FBI told the agency in early 2020 that the first person infected worked in the Wuhan lab.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
545d
The US Intelligence Community says there's no clear evidence that Covid leaked from a lab in China, but there is. And now we are the first to report that a Chinese source trusted by the FBI told the agency in early 2020 that the first person infected worked in the Wuhan lab.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
177d
The CIA now agrees with other intel agencies that Covid came from China. Finally. Incredible it took the election of Trump for the truth to come out. We reported 18 months ago that the patients zero worked in the Wuhan lab. Now let's get truth on Russiagate, laptop, JFK & UAPs.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
769d
After years of official claims to the contrary, strong new evidence suggests the virus known as SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a Chinese lab. According to multiple sources, the researchers who led gain-of-function research, which increases infectiousness, were the first to be infected.

The statement suggests that the Biden administration withheld information about the origins of COVID-19, implying political motivations and a lack of transparency. It also credits the election of Trump with bringing this information to light, which introduces a partisan angle.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims about government actions, which may contribute to public distrust. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It accuses the Biden administration of illegal actions without providing evidence, which could be seen as disrespectful and potentially defamatory. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on assigning blame rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in a personal attack on the Biden administration, which does not align with constructive criticism. [-1]