Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -87
1/26/2025, 3:57:44 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
177d
The CIA analysis "was completed and published internally before Ratcliffe’s arrival."

That means that the Biden administration illegally withheld the truth from the public.

Had Trump not been elected, we likely would never have known this.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
177d
A Chinese source trusted by the FBI told the agency in early 2020 that the first person infected worked in the Wuhan lab.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
545d
The US Intelligence Community says there's no clear evidence that Covid leaked from a lab in China, but there is. And now we are the first to report that a Chinese source trusted by the FBI told the agency in early 2020 that the first person infected worked in the Wuhan lab.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
177d
The CIA now agrees with other intel agencies that Covid came from China. Finally. Incredible it took the election of Trump for the truth to come out. We reported 18 months ago that the patients zero worked in the Wuhan lab. Now let's get truth on Russiagate, laptop, JFK & UAPs.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
769d
After years of official claims to the contrary, strong new evidence suggests the virus known as SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a Chinese lab. According to multiple sources, the researchers who led gain-of-function research, which increases infectiousness, were the first to be infected.

The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by discussing the origins of COVID-19 and the U.S. government's handling of related intelligence. The tone is critical of the Biden administration, suggesting a lack of transparency and possible legal violations. The content implies a political bias, highlighting the role of the Trump administration in revealing information.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by spreading potentially unverified claims about the origins of COVID-19, which could influence public perception negatively. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be seen as engaging in political bias, which may not fully respect the dignity of those involved. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the Biden administration but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on accusations. [-1]