Michael Schellenberger

Rank 43 of 47
|
Score -95
1/26/2025, 4:01:32 AM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
179d
President Joe Biden’s Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) released to Congress a 10-page summary of U.S. intelligence on the potential links between China’s Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) and the COVID-19 pandemic on June 23, 2023.

The summary claimed…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
179d
The CIA analysis "was completed and published internally before Ratcliffe’s arrival."

That means that the Biden administration illegally withheld the truth from the public.

Had Trump not been elected, we likely would never have known this.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
179d
A Chinese source trusted by the FBI told the agency in early 2020 that the first person infected worked in the Wuhan lab.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
547d
The US Intelligence Community says there's no clear evidence that Covid leaked from a lab in China, but there is. And now we are the first to report that a Chinese source trusted by the FBI told the agency in early 2020 that the first person infected worked in the Wuhan lab.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
179d
The CIA now agrees with other intel agencies that Covid came from China. Finally. Incredible it took the election of Trump for the truth to come out. We reported 18 months ago that the patients zero worked in the Wuhan lab. Now let's get truth on Russiagate, laptop, JFK & UAPs.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
771d
After years of official claims to the contrary, strong new evidence suggests the virus known as SARS-CoV-2 escaped from a Chinese lab. According to multiple sources, the researchers who led gain-of-function research, which increases infectiousness, were the first to be infected.

The statement questions the Biden administration's handling of information regarding COVID-19's origins, suggesting disinformation and a cover-up by the CIA. It implies a lack of transparency and accountability, raising concerns about public rights to information.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement accuses the administration of spreading disinformation, which could be seen as harmful if unsubstantiated, but it also calls for transparency, which aligns with the principle of doing no harm by promoting truth. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It challenges the administration's actions, potentially respecting public interest but could infringe on privacy if based on speculation.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is critical and accusatory, which may not foster constructive dialogue, but it does raise questions about government accountability. [-1]