Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 103
1/26/2025, 2:42:41 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
152d
@truth_in_sv @sama @HooverInst I would fly down for that, if you want to ask them to ask him. Could also get it streamed live by high profile media, get a good neutral moderator like @erikbryn, etc
Truth Seeker in Silicon Valley
@truth_in_sv
·
152d
@GaryMarcus @sama I support such debate and in fact, if it happens and the option exists, I would attend in person! Maybe we can talk to @HooverInst about organizing it?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
152d
Good question! Many people (and eg even major tv networks) have offered to host Altman versus Marcus.

Why indeed won’t @sama publicly debate this ideas in AI?
Truth Seeker in Silicon Valley
@truth_in_sv
·
152d
@RomeoLupascu @Napoli_Fella @GaryMarcus For example, why doesn't @sama agree to debate in public his ideas on AI with someone who counters them? Instead all of his public apparencies are carefully orchestrated exercises of propaganda and gaslighting. At least Richard Dawkins had the guts to debate John Lennox...

The statement is part of a broader conversation about organizing a public debate on AI, involving public figures and institutions. It suggests potential co-hosts for the event, contributing to the civic dialogue on AI and public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement itself does not cause harm, but it is part of a conversation that includes harmful language in earlier replies. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, but earlier parts of the conversation include disrespectful language. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by suggesting collaboration for a public debate. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks, but earlier parts of the conversation do. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to suggest a constructive public debate, which could benefit society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by encouraging a public debate and using the platform responsibly. [+1]