Gary Marcus

Rank 9 of 47
|
Score 124
1/26/2025, 2:43:21 PM
X
In reply to:
Neve Peric
@neve_peric
·
152d
@GaryMarcus @sama All bullies are cowards, Gary
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
152d
Good question! Many people (and eg even major tv networks) have offered to host Altman versus Marcus.

Why indeed won’t @sama publicly debate this ideas in AI?
Truth Seeker in Silicon Valley
@truth_in_sv
·
152d
@RomeoLupascu @Napoli_Fella @GaryMarcus For example, why doesn't @sama agree to debate in public his ideas on AI with someone who counters them? Instead all of his public apparencies are carefully orchestrated exercises of propaganda and gaslighting. At least Richard Dawkins had the guts to debate John Lennox...

The statement is part of a broader conversation about public figures in AI and their willingness to engage in public debate. It indirectly addresses the issue of public discourse and debate in the field of AI, which is a public concern. The tone of the statement is neutral, acknowledging the behavior of certain individuals without engaging in direct criticism or personal attacks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and maintains a neutral tone, thus adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the behavior of public figures rather than attacking them personally. [+1]