In reply to:
Braden
@BradenFerrin
·
165d
The statement '@BradenFerrin still wrong.' is a brief and dismissive reply in an ongoing conversation about claims made by public figures. It lacks substantive engagement with the issues being discussed, such as the feasibility of solving longevity or the financial claims made by Sam. The tone is confrontational and does not contribute to a constructive dialogue.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the previous comment without providing any reasoning or evidence, which could be seen as a form of personal attack or dismissiveness. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.