In reply to:
Braden
@BradenFerrin
·
166d
The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages with public figures and issues related to claims about financial and scientific capabilities, which are relevant to societal concerns about truthfulness and accountability in public statements.
- The statement uses strong language and accusations, which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of the individuals mentioned, as it accuses them of lying without providing evidence, which could be seen as a form of harassment. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it resorts to personal attacks and does not provide a reasoned argument or evidence to support the claims. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses a public platform to make serious accusations, which could be seen as irresponsible if not substantiated, potentially violating the principle of using free speech responsibly. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.