Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64

The statement suggests a conspiracy theory that a group or movement (e/acc) might be funded by China, implying negligence or complicity in China's advancements. It engages with public issues related to international relations and technological competition, thus constituting public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims, which may lead to misinformation or fear-mongering. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of those involved by implying they are funded by a foreign government without evidence, which could be seen as a form of defamation or harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it makes an accusatory claim without fostering dialogue or understanding. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes an unsubstantiated claim rather than providing evidence or engaging in reasoned debate. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not use the platform responsibly, as it spreads a potentially harmful and unverified claim, which could undermine public trust. [-2]