In reply to:
Signe Johansen
@SigneSJohansen
·
350d
The statement is part of a conversation that critiques claims made by public figures about financial and scientific achievements. It engages with public issues related to transparency and honesty in business and science, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm others but is part of a critical discussion about public claims.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but is critical of public figures.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy but rather skepticism and critique. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to question public claims, aligning with free speech principles. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.