Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 83
1/27/2025, 10:50:55 AM
X
In reply to:
Chris0xFFF
@Chris0xFFF
·
350d
@guyfrom2045 @GaryMarcus Meta open sourced llama because they did not have a leading model and the best commercial opportunity was to throw sand in their competitors gears by having them compete against something that was free.

Classic Silicon Valley tactics.
guyfrom2045
@guyfrom2045
·
350d
@GaryMarcus Hard disagree on this sort of narrow nationalistic view. Humanity is in this together. Open source and decentralisation are the ways in which we avoid potentially devastating ai arms race. By open sourcing Llama, Meta are definitely the good guys in this story. So is Deepseek.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
350d
Let’s say some companies in the US had some secret way to manufacture something cool, and a lot of people were excited about that technique, and then one of the companies that understood that technique gave it away to a country that we were in a competitive relationship, leading…

The statement is part of a broader conversation about the implications of open-sourcing AI models, specifically Meta's decision to open-source Llama. This discussion touches on public issues such as technological competition, open-source ethics, and global collaboration in AI development. The tone is analytical and contributes to the debate on whether open-sourcing is a strategic move for talent recruitment and competition.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is neutral in tone, focusing on strategic business practices.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does contribute to a broader understanding of business strategies.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by adding a perspective on talent recruitment without personal attacks. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to discuss the potential societal impact of open-sourcing AI, contributing to the betterment of society by engaging in this discourse. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly contributing to the discussion on open-source practices. [+1]