Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement criticizes the financial benefits that Members of Congress allegedly receive from voting for war funding, calling it corruption and advocating for a ban on stock ownership in defense companies by Congress members and their families. The tone is accusatory and calls for policy change, engaging with public issues of ethics and governance.
- The statement uses strong language ('disgusting', 'corruption') which could be seen as harmful, but it is directed at systemic issues rather than individuals, aiming to highlight perceived ethical concerns. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of a perceived ethical issue in governance, aiming to foster empathy for those affected by war profiteering. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes a systemic issue, aligning with constructive dialogue principles. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for policy change, aiming to improve ethical standards in governance. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to address a public concern responsibly, advocating for transparency and integrity in public office. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.