Reposted by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
The statement criticizes the financial benefits that Members of Congress may receive from voting to pass funding for war, calling it corruption and advocating for a ban on stock ownership in war manufacturing by Congress members and their families. The tone is assertive and accusatory, aiming to address a perceived ethical issue in government practices.
- The statement uses strong language ('disgusting', 'corruption') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, but it is directed at a systemic issue rather than individuals, partially adhering to the principle. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of a potential conflict of interest in Congress, aiming to foster empathy for those affected by war profiteering, thus aligning with this principle. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks against specific individuals, focusing instead on the broader issue of policy and ethics, adhering to this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to advocate for policy change that could benefit society by reducing conflicts of interest in government, aligning with this principle. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to address a public concern responsibly, adhering to this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.