0
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
321d
In reply to:
The statement suggests U.S. government involvement in censorship in Brazil, implying a significant international political issue. It raises concerns about foreign influence and censorship, which are important public discourse topics.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims, but it also raises awareness about possible governmental overreach. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could be seen as accusatory without clear evidence, potentially affecting reputations. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding of international relations and censorship issues. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism of government actions, which is constructive if based on evidence. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.