Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
321d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
321d
Ana Paula Henkel
@AnaPaulaVolei
·
321d
The statement and linked content engage in public discourse by discussing the role of the U.S. government and related organizations in Brazil's censorship practices. It raises concerns about international influence and censorship, which are significant public issues.
- The statement raises concerns about censorship, which could be seen as promoting awareness of potential harm caused by such practices. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or violate privacy, focusing instead on organizations and governmental actions. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By questioning the role of international agencies, the statement could promote understanding and dialogue about global influence on national policies. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement invites further investigation and dialogue, which aligns with constructive criticism, though it could be more balanced in presenting multiple perspectives. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.