Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
1106d
In reply to:
Insurrection Barbie
@DefiyantlyFree
·
321d
The statement is part of a broader conversation about government funding to organizations and the role of media and intelligence agencies in shaping public narratives. It engages with public issues related to transparency, media influence, and government accountability.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but raises concerns about government spending and media practices, which can be seen as promoting accountability.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- There is no evidence of disrespecting privacy or engaging in harassment or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does encourage scrutiny of public institutions.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on institutional actions. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By questioning government spending and media practices, the statement uses influence to potentially better society by promoting transparency. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a public debate about government and media actions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.