In reply to:
Pariah
@JRusso401
·
208d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
208d
The statement is a skeptical inquiry challenging the basis of another user's claim about fraud. It questions the certainty and source of the user's knowledge, suggesting a demand for evidence or clarification.
- The statement engages in dialogue by questioning the basis of a claim, which can be seen as a form of constructive criticism. However, it lacks depth and does not provide any evidence or reasoning to support its skepticism, nor does it offer a constructive path forward in the discussion.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.