In reply to:
Nikole
@n8lykind
·
130d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
130d
The statement is a critique of the involvement of non-professionals, specifically Elon Musk and his team, in auditing government-related activities. It questions their qualifications and the legitimacy of their actions, suggesting that experienced professionals should handle such tasks. The tone is critical and somewhat dismissive, focusing on the importance of expertise in auditing processes.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses a dismissive tone towards Elon Musk and his team, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the competence of specific individuals.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or solutions, and it borders on personal attacks by calling the team 'computer goons.' [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to question the qualifications of those involved in auditing, which could be seen as advocating for better practices, but it lacks a constructive approach.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be more responsible and respectful in its critique. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.