In reply to:
Leonard Knight
@leonardknight
·
148d
Ilhan Omar
@IlhanMN
·
149d
The statement engages in public discourse as it addresses the transparency and accountability of public officials and the legislative process. It implies a critique of how bills are passed and made public, suggesting a need for greater scrutiny and understanding.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a critique of the legislative process, which is a neutral stance.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on critiquing the process rather than fostering dialogue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by suggesting that the process of passing bills and making them public is akin to the proposed review of payments. It does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by engaging in a critique of public processes, using the platform to question and discuss public issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.