Reposted by Ilhan Omar
The statement by Casar critiques the focus of a subcommittee chaired by Marjorie Taylor Greene and House Republicans, suggesting they are prioritizing investigations into minor financial matters over more significant ones, such as Elon Musk's contracts. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived misprioritization in public policy discussions.
- The statement does not directly harm with words or actions, but it does imply criticism of certain political figures and their priorities.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does mention public figures in a critical context.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by highlighting a perceived issue in public policy focus, but it does so in a critical manner. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of political figures and their actions, but it does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to draw attention to a public issue, potentially contributing to societal betterment by encouraging scrutiny of public policy priorities. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by engaging in political critique, using the platform to address public concerns. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.