The statement critiques a public figure's comments on vaccine safety, suggesting a lack of prior agreement or understanding. It engages in public discourse by addressing the public issue of vaccine safety and the responsibilities of public officials.
- The statement does not directly harm with words but implies criticism of a public figure's actions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, as it focuses on public discourse.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is critical and somewhat sarcastic. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to question public statements responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.