Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement addresses a public health issue, specifically the safety and evaluation of vaccines, which is a significant public concern. The tone is assertive, aiming to correct misinformation about vaccine safety evaluations.
- The statement strives to do no harm by correcting misinformation about vaccine safety, which is crucial for public health. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By providing factual information about vaccine safety evaluations, the statement promotes understanding and potentially empathy for those concerned about vaccine safety. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather focuses on correcting a factual inaccuracy, which aligns with constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement implicitly acknowledges a mistake in the conversation by correcting the misinformation about vaccine safety evaluations. [+1]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses the platform to responsibly disseminate accurate information about vaccine safety, upholding the principles of free speech. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.