Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -151
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
329d
USAID's defenders say it's about charity and development in poor nations. It's not. It's a $40 billion driver of regime change abroad. And now the evidence suggests that it, along with the CIA, were behind the 2019 impeachment of Trump — an illegal regime change effort at home.
2/14/2025, 12:20:21 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
321d
USAID said it was a charitable group. It wasn't. It was a tool for regime change. After 2016, it turned its guns inward. In 2019, a front group it created fabricated the evidence used by the CIA, moles in the White House, and House Democrats to impeach Trump. That's treason.
Thomas Massie
@RepThomasMassie
·
321d
USAID funded an organization that fabricated evidence which was used to impeach President Trump.

The Deep State frequently funds regime change efforts abroad, but when it uses taxpayer money to undermine our own government, isn't that treason?

The statement and linked content engage in public discourse by discussing allegations against USAID and the CIA related to political events, specifically the impeachment of former President Trump. The tone is accusatory, suggesting misuse of power and treason.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement makes serious allegations without providing evidence in the text, potentially causing harm by spreading unverified claims. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement accuses organizations and individuals of treason, which could be seen as disrespectful and damaging to reputations without substantiated evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide a balanced view, focusing instead on accusations. [-2]