Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
321d
In reply to:
The statement 'Yes' by @RepThomasMassie is a direct agreement with the preceding conversation, which involves serious allegations about USAID and its role in fabricating evidence for the impeachment of President Trump. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with significant public issues related to government actions, foreign policy, and the impeachment process.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but it supports a narrative that could be harmful if unsubstantiated. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it supports a potentially harmful narrative without evidence. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it simply agrees with a controversial claim without further explanation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it merely agrees with a serious accusation without providing evidence or engaging in discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to support a controversial claim, which could be seen as not contributing to the betterment of society if the claim is unsubstantiated. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not demonstrate responsible use of the platform, as it supports a serious accusation without evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.