Michael Schellenberger

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -151

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to free speech and democracy, particularly criticizing European policies and advocating for American values. It aligns with political debates on censorship and free speech, making it a substantive engagement with public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others with words, but it does criticize European policies, which could be seen as confrontational.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does generalize about Europe in a potentially disrespectful manner. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it takes a confrontational stance against Europe. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes broad accusations without engaging in a nuanced discussion. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for American values, which could be seen as an attempt to better society, but it does so by criticizing another region. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by advocating for them, but it could be more responsible and balanced in its critique. [+1]