In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
323d
The statement 'Bravo @JDVance !' is a supportive reply to a conversation about free speech and democracy, specifically criticizing Europe's approach to these issues. The conversation involves public figures and addresses significant public concerns about censorship and democratic values, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but supports a critique of European policies, which could be seen as indirectly harmful if it misrepresents or oversimplifies complex issues.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement lacks an effort to promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it simply praises a critique without engaging in deeper dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it merely expresses agreement without providing substantive arguments or evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement supports free speech, aligning with the principle of upholding free speech, but does not demonstrate responsible use of the platform as it lacks depth and context. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.