Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -98
2/14/2025, 2:57:09 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
326d
Bravo @JDVance !
Rapid Response 47
@RapidResponse47
·
326d
.@VP in Munich: "The threat that I worry the most about vis-a-vis Europe ... is the threat from within — the retreat of Europe from some of its most fundamental values, values shared with the United States."
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
326d
JD Vance is right: the greatest threat to free speech and democracy in the Western world comes from Europe. This week, I warned of the global axis of censorship, and why America must stand up for our founding values. It is inspiring to see the Trump admin. center free speech!
Greg Price
@greg_price11
·
326d
JD Vance went to the Munich Security Conference and roasted the entire continent of Europe for being petty tyrants and criminalizing freedom of speech, including a British man arrested for praying at an abortion clinic.

The statement is part of a broader conversation about free speech and democracy, particularly in the context of Europe and the United States. It references public figures and events, engaging in a critique of perceived threats to democratic values and free speech. The tone is critical and somewhat provocative, aiming to highlight concerns about censorship and democratic principles.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others with words, but it uses a provocative tone that could be seen as dismissive or mocking towards certain individuals, such as Greta Thunberg and Elon Musk. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use a dismissive tone towards public figures.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but does not provide a platform for constructive dialogue or address counterarguments, potentially bordering on ad hominem by dismissing individuals rather than their ideas. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about perceived threats to free speech and democracy, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech by discussing its importance and perceived threats, but the tone could be more responsible and constructive. [+1]