Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -98
In reply to:

The statement and conversation involve significant public discourse, touching on issues of political influence, election integrity, and freedom of speech. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting misconduct by a European official and potential interference in democratic processes.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims about election interference, which could undermine public trust in democratic institutions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement may violate privacy and dignity by making serious allegations against a public figure without clear evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism, focusing on alleged misconduct without providing a balanced view. [-2]