Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -98
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
330d

The statement suggests a connection between the military-industrial complex and censorship in the EU and US, implying a critique of power structures and their influence on free speech. It engages with public issues related to governance, censorship, and democracy.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as potentially harmful if it spreads misinformation or unfounded claims, but it also raises concerns about power dynamics. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It challenges public figures and institutions, which is a common aspect of public discourse, but it should avoid personal attacks.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote awareness of perceived issues in governance, though it may lack empathy towards those it criticizes.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of public figures and institutions, which is constructive if based on evidence, but it risks being seen as an ad hominem attack if not substantiated. [-1]