Michael Schellenberger

Rank 39 of 47
|
Score -98

The statement is a reply to a conversation about the EU Commission and the DSA, which are public issues related to censorship and free speech. The original statement by @FernKartheiser raises concerns about potential censorship by the EU Commission, which is a substantive engagement with public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, as it is a thank you note. However, it indirectly supports a conversation that could be seen as critical of the EU Commission's actions, which some might interpret as harmful if they disagree with the stance.
  2. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech by engaging in a dialogue about censorship, a key issue related to free speech. It uses the platform to express concerns about potential overreach by the EU Commission. [+1]