Fernand Kartheiser
@FernKartheiser
·
331d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about free speech and censorship within the European Parliament and the EU Commission. It expresses gratitude towards individuals and groups resisting perceived threats to free speech, indicating a stance on a significant public issue.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it uses strong language ('greatest threat', 'totalitarians') that could be seen as inflammatory. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it uses charged language that could be interpreted as disrespectful towards the European Parliament. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy towards those fighting for free speech, but it lacks compassion towards the European Parliament by labeling it as a threat.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but uses strong language that could hinder constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing concerns about censorship and supporting those who advocate for free speech, but it should be more balanced to responsibly use the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.