Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement addresses the issue of free speech in Europe, suggesting that it is under attack by the European Commission and national governments. It expresses gratitude to a public figure for speaking out on this issue, implying a call to action for Europe to return to its core values, which can be interpreted as a substantive engagement with public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it implies criticism of European institutions, which could be seen as harmful if not substantiated.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of the speaker's perspective on free speech, but it lacks empathy and compassion towards the European Commission and national governments. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not provide constructive criticism or dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight an issue of free speech, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principle of free speech by advocating for it, but it should ensure that claims are responsibly made and substantiated. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.