Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
929d
The statement criticizes the Department of Homeland Security's cybersecurity agency, labeling it as corrupt and totalitarian, and celebrates the firing of employees. It implies that the agency engaged in censorship, which is a significant public issue related to free speech and government overreach.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It accuses individuals and an agency of corruption and totalitarianism without providing evidence, which may not respect their privacy and dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses divisive language. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against a government agency, but it does so in a manner that may not be responsible or with integrity. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.