Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
775d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
331d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
929d
The statement accuses the DHS of illegal censorship activities, suggesting a collaboration with military forces and referencing a whistleblower's revelations. It implies a significant breach of public trust and governmental overreach.
- The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims about government actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It challenges the integrity of a government agency, which could be seen as disrespectful if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on accusations. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The tone is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue, potentially inciting distrust without offering solutions. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against a government agency, which could be seen as responsible if the claims are true, but harmful if not. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.