Gary Marcus

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 65
2/16/2025, 6:35:55 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
280d
@jimmy_wales @theinformation that’s Grok 2 that you tried; this is from Grok 3 that he is introducing tomorrow.
Jimmy Wales
@jimmy_wales
·
280d
@GaryMarcus @theinformation I just asked Grok the same question and it gave a long and reasonable answer. I think Elon was just trolling.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
280d
⚠️⚠️⚠️

Everyone—and not just @theinformation—should be genuinely terrified that the richest man in the world has built a Large Language Model that spouts propaganda in his image.

This isn’t free speech. It’s a massive, massive thumb on the scale, from one
of the most powerful…
Elon Musk
@elonmusk
·
280d
Grok 3 is so based 😂

The statement and the conversation it is part of engage in public discourse by discussing the influence of a powerful individual on AI and media. The tone is critical and raises concerns about potential bias and control over information.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about potential harm caused by biased AI, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but critiques a public figure's influence, which is a legitimate part of public discourse. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding of the potential risks of AI controlled by powerful individuals. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of a public figure's actions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]