Gary Marcus

The statement engages in a discussion about media influence and historical context, challenging the idea that Fox filled a void in media. It references the popularity of Rush Limbaugh and the presence of diverse media outlets, suggesting a more nuanced historical perspective.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm and provides a factual counterpoint, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   By providing historical context, the statement promotes understanding and a more informed discussion, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive criticism by challenging a previous assertion with historical evidence, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]