Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
2/18/2025, 11:26:30 PM
X
In reply to:
Alex Volkov (Thursd/AI) 🔜 AIENG summit NY
@altryne
·
267d
@GaryMarcus @karpathy This example is not at all similar, they have an auto regressive image model connected to Grok3, which nobody said was updated together with Grok the LLM. It's being used as a tool call.

Regarding "coming across as"... even grok himself doesn't think I said anything close to…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
267d
@altryne @karpathy 1. i got my fact in this case from Andrej; he is a legit source. At that point I didn’t know how to access without premium+.

2. Now that I figured how to access without additional cost I just tried a similar example that was not publicized and got this result below, and see the…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
267d
Grok 3, “smartest AI on earth”
Alex Volkov (Thursd/AI) 🔜 AIENG summit NY
@altryne
·
267d
@GaryMarcus @karpathy I don't believe I ever was rude to you Gary, but definitely not in this instance.

You in fact did not check your facts, your source was Andrej, and I'm not saying he's wrong, but replicating this on your own (like me and Ivan did) would be considered "checking your facts"

I…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
267d
Incredible how this guy smugly thinks I didn’t check my facts, when of course I had a source.

In fact I got my report from @Karpathy (screen capture below), and the fact that Grok 3 *sometimes* can count the letter l’s in a specific word, especially after a massively publicized…
Alex Volkov (Thursd/AI) 🔜 AIENG summit NY
@altryne
·
267d
Dear Gary, please check your facts before posting

Respectfully, the world.

(this is with search off and no thinking enabled, as basic as it @grok can be)

The statement is part of a public discourse about the performance and evaluation of AI models. It addresses issues related to AI capabilities and the importance of acknowledging problems in technology.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement points out issues without using harmful language, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy but could be seen as slightly confrontational, which may not fully respect the dignity of others.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting issues noted by an expert, but the tone could be perceived as defensive.