Gary Marcus

Rank 15 of 47
|
Score 76
2/18/2025, 11:27:33 PM
X
In reply to:
Alex Volkov (Thursd/AI) 🔜 AIENG summit NY
@altryne
·
267d
@GaryMarcus @karpathy This example is not at all similar, they have an auto regressive image model connected to Grok3, which nobody said was updated together with Grok the LLM. It's being used as a tool call.

Regarding "coming across as"... even grok himself doesn't think I said anything close to…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
267d
@altryne @karpathy 1. i got my fact in this case from Andrej; he is a legit source. At that point I didn’t know how to access without premium+.

2. Now that I figured how to access without additional cost I just tried a similar example that was not publicized and got this result below, and see the…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
267d
Grok 3, “smartest AI on earth”
Alex Volkov (Thursd/AI) 🔜 AIENG summit NY
@altryne
·
267d
@GaryMarcus @karpathy I don't believe I ever was rude to you Gary, but definitely not in this instance.

You in fact did not check your facts, your source was Andrej, and I'm not saying he's wrong, but replicating this on your own (like me and Ivan did) would be considered "checking your facts"

I…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
267d
Incredible how this guy smugly thinks I didn’t check my facts, when of course I had a source.

In fact I got my report from @Karpathy (screen capture below), and the fact that Grok 3 *sometimes* can count the letter l’s in a specific word, especially after a massively publicized…
Alex Volkov (Thursd/AI) 🔜 AIENG summit NY
@altryne
·
267d
Dear Gary, please check your facts before posting

Respectfully, the world.

(this is with search off and no thinking enabled, as basic as it @grok can be)

The statement is confrontational and accusatory, focusing on perceived rudeness and factual inaccuracies. It lacks constructive dialogue and escalates the conflict.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it accuses the other party of being smug and rude. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of others, engaging in a personal attack. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism, opting for a confrontational tone instead. [-1]